CUSTOMERS

Bank Stays Ahead of Attackers with Cymulate Security Validation

The bank’s Head of Cybersecurity continuously assesses compliance regulations in the field to stay on top of his team’s security programming and standards. The Head of Cybersecurity had already implemented methods for security validation but believed that a more proactive and automated approach would help the bank’s security program progress further. The security team faced the following challenges:

  • Lacking continuous validation
    In addition to its annual required penetration tests, the team arranges a penetration test when a new technology is added or a new banking service is released. While these manual assessments are helpful, they provide only a point-in-time view, offering a partial picture of the bank’s security posture without accounting for the evolving threat landscape.
  • Difficult to validate against emerging threats
    The team tried to aggregate its threat intelligence from different platforms to validate against emerging threats, but the manual process was slow, unscalable and inefficient. 
  • Unable to prioritize remediation
    The team has strict lead times for remediation based on each vulnerability's criticality. However, without validating each vulnerability in the company’s security infrastructure and assessing it against its defenses, the team found it challenging to understand the vulnerability’s actual level of risk.
Book a Demo