Cymulate vs Picus Security
You don’t have time to manage another security platform. Optimize your security defenses with an easy-to-use platform that covers the full kill-chain.
Cymulate Named
a G2 Leader
Cymulate Recognized as Leader for Security and Exposure Validation
Cymulate Named a
Customer’s Choice
2024 Gartner® Peer Insights™ Voice of the Customer for BAS Tools Report
Simplify Exposure Validation
Security teams recognize they don’t need more assessments – they need a way to improve. Picus provides basic breach and attack simulation that requires too many assessments because each control is evaluated individually. A basic test for ransomware best practices could require eight different assessments. If you want to validate detection, that will cost extra while requiring double the agents and custom queries to sync every scenario.
Cymulate Exposure Validation provides a complete solution with both breach and attack simulation and automated red teaming in a platform built to make every blue teamer and red team better. The Cymulate platform can test all controls in a single test or go deep on a single control to optimize prevention and detection for on-prem, cloud and hybrid environments. By validating controls, threats and response, Cymulate customers can focus on the exploitable and not waste time configuring another security platform.
Cymulate vs Picus Comparison Chart
Use Case | Capabilities | Picus Security |
Defensive Posture Optimization | Security controls integrations | Deep control integrations to validate detection and prevention. | Offers many control integrations, but the technical requirements are cumbersome with a dedicated agent and manual query creation for every scenario that requires detection validation. | ||
Threat-informed defenses | Automates IoC updates to controls.
Custom detection rules for EDR, SIEM and XDR control tuning guidance. | Automated control updates limited to Crowdstrike. Manually download and apply rules to each control. | |||
Scale Offensive Testing | Attack Scenario creation workbench | Build custom attack chains from a library of >100,000 attack actions.
Create custom scenarios/ attack actions.
AI attack planner converts threat advisories and plain language prompts into custom attack chains. | Chained assessments are not realistic because there is no delay between actions. | ||
Automation, extensible testing | Out-of-the box templates for threats, controls, cloud, Kubernetes and more. Modify templates and best practices for your specific environment (OS, cloud, databases, SaaS, etc.) | No testing of cloud security controls, only cloud configurations. | |||
Attack paths | Automated red teaming provides white box and grey box testing to validate attack paths. | Limited to basic lateral movement with user-defined scope. | |||
Exposure Awareness | Automated & continuous testing | Easy and automated testing for continuous validation of threats, security controls, threats and response capabilities. | Basic breach and attack simulation for repeatable testing. | ||
Always current attack scenario knowledge | Daily updates of the latest threats and continuously adding new assessments. | Basic threat updates. |
Exposure validation that filters out the noise, so you can focus on the exploitable.
Validate Controls
Find and fix your gaps
Validate Threats
Know your risk
Validate Response
BATTLE test your SOC
Why Companies Choose Cymulate Over Picus
What our customers say about us
Organizations across all industries choose Cymulate for exposure validation, proactively confirming that defenses are robust and reliable-before an attack occurs.
Upgrading from Picus to Cymulate is easy.
We’ve helped numerous clients upgrade from Picus to Cymulate. We’ll help you build and customize production-safe assessments for all your environments (adding to the ones that Picus covered), optimize your controls and reduce exposure risk.