Detection Engineering 
Made Easy

View Solution Brief
81%

MITRE ATT&CK techniques not covered by average SIEM 

Source: CardinalOps

49%

Security teams report challenges validating custom detections 

Source: Anvilogic

18%

SIEM rules are broken and will never fire due to issues with data sources

Source: CardinalOps

Validate detection gaps
Validate MITRE and threat coverage to pinpoint weak or missing detection rules – and the logs supporting those rules.  
Streamline rule creation 
Create new detection rules for specific threats by simulating the attack and applying recommended rules for gaps.
Validate IR playbooks 
Run live-data exercises to test security operations and response to new and common threats. 
Solution Features 
MITRE ATT&CK HEATMAP
Control Integrations
Create new detection rules
image
image
Solution Features 
Visualize threat coverage and MITRE techniques validated by attack simulation for common threats and active campaigns. 
API connections with security controls provide the visibility and insights to validate log collection, threat detection and alerting.
Mitigate threat exposure with recommended detection rules applied directly to your SIEM, EDR and XDR. 
Validate if new rules trigger the correct alerts, ensuring that detection remains effective against evolving attack techniques and threats. 
Test security processes, policies and playbooks and integrate offensive (red team) and defensive (blue team) strategies for a holistic approach to security validation. 

81%

60%

50%

Accelerate rule creation 
Automate and streamline the detection engineering workflow to reduce your mean time to detect (MTTD). 
Improve detection accuracy 
Reduce false positives and false negatives, giving analysts higher confidence in alerts and decreasing alert fatigue.
image
Visualize coverage gaps
To prioritize improvements, visualize how well your detections align with threat frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK. 
image
Minimize exposure risk
Reduce the likelihood of a cyber attack evading detection and leading to a material cyber breach.
“When we create a new detection rule in our SIEM that we can’t validate with historical logs, we use Cymulate assessments to generate the appropriate events and see if the rule was successful in its detection. The immediate feedback is useful when fine-tuning our SIEM and practicing detection engineering.”
– Markus Flatscher, Senior Security Manager
“Using the Cymulate integrations, we launch assessments to see if our tools detect them. If they don’t, Cymulate provides mitigation guidance and Sigma rules, and we easily rerun the assessments to validate remediation.”
– Karl Ward, Head of Cybersecurity
“As a MITRE ATT&CK shop, Cymulate quickly shows me top MITRE techniques not prevented or not detected, so I give my detection engineering team more specific data on what needs to be improved.” 
– Lead Red Team Engineer 
“I am not a programmer, but with Cymulate, I was able to set up a reliable incident response exercise, and I didn’t have to worry about the execution. Overall, we cut the total time spent on the exercise by at least 60%.” 
– Head of Cybersecurity Operations
Book a Demo