Cymulate vs Pentera
You don’t need another pen test. Proactively validate your controls and optimize security.
Why Automated Pen Testing Is Not Enough
Threat exposure validation requires optimizing defenses, scaling offensive testing and increasing exposure awareness. While Pentera is useful for identifying security gaps with automated penetration testing, it lacks the depth needed to fully assess and strengthen defenses.
Validate Controls to Focus on True Exposures
Cymulate offers a more comprehensive approach to identifying and fixing security gaps through breach simulation and automated red teaming. By testing the overall effectiveness of security controls, it reveals unmitigated exposures and provides actionable guidance to strengthen defenses before the next attack.
“Automated and regular penetration testing can identify vulnerabilities that might be exploited to achieve a certain objective. However, it can be too narrow in scope and infrequent to be leveraged as an alternative.”
– Gartner, A Guidance Framework for Developing and Implementing Vulnerability Management, Jan. 2025
Cymulate vs Pentera Comparison Chart
Use Case | Capabilities | Pentera |
Defensive Posture Optimization | Security controls integrations | Deep control integrations to validate detection and prevention. | No control integrations. | ||
Threat-informed defenses | Automates IoC updates to controls. Custom detection rules for EDR, SIEM and XDR Control tuning guidance. | No IoCs updates. No detection rules. No control optimization. | |||
Scale Offensive Testing | Attack Scenario creation workbench | Build custom attack chains from a library of >100,000 attack actions. Create custom scenarios/ attack actions. AI attack planner converts threat advisories and plain language prompts into custom attack chains. | Built for easy point and test but operates as a “black box” to users with no ability to build custom scenarios or attack chains. | ||
Automation, extensible testing | Out-of-the box templates for threats, controls, cloud, Kubernetes and more. Modify templates and best practices for your specific environment (OS, cloud, databases, SaaS, etc.) | Users are limited to Pentera templates.
Very limited customization to adapt tests for specific environments (OS, cloud, databases, SaaS, etc.) | |||
Attack paths | Automated red teaming provides white box and grey box testing to validate attack paths. | Automated pen testing provides white box and black box testing to validate attack paths. | |||
Exposure Awareness | Automated & continuous testing | Easy and automated testing for continuous validation of threats, security controls, threats and response capabilities. | Testing that identifies vulnerabilities and executes attacks but cannot identify control gaps. | ||
Always current attack scenario knowledge | Daily updates of the latest threats and continuously adding new assessments. | No daily updates of the latest threats and infrequent updates of attack techniques. |
Exposure validation that filters out the noise, so you can focus on the exploitable.
Validate Controls
Find and fix your gaps
Validate Threats
Know your risk
Validate Response
Battle test your SOC
Why Companies Choose Cymulate Over Pentera
What our customers say about us
Organizations across all industries choose Cymulate for exposure validation, proactively confirming that defenses are robust and reliable-before an attack occurs.
Upgrading from Pentera
to Cymulate is easy.
We’ve helped numerous clients upgrade from Pentera to Cymulate. We’ll help you build and customize production-safe assessments for all your environments (adding to the ones that Pentera covered), optimize your controls and reduce exposure risk.