Cymulate vs Scythe
See the difference between proven exposure validation and a complex red team tool.
Cymulate Named
a G2 Leader
Cymulate Recognized as Leader for Security and Exposure Validation
Cymulate Named a
Customer’s Choice
2024 Gartner® Peer Insights™ Voice of the Customer for BAS Tools Report
Exposure Validation Demands More than Just Another Pen Testing Tool
Effective threat exposure validation requires optimizing defense, scaling offensive testing, and increasing exposure awareness. While Scythe excels at custom attack campaigns for advanced red teams, it falls short in remediation. Cymulate offers a more complete solution for identifying, prioritizing, and eliminating security gaps.
Validate Controls to Focus on True Exposures
Cymulate offers a comprehensive approach to identifying and fixing security gaps through breach and attack simulation and automated red teaming. By testing security controls, it reveals unmitigated exposures and provides actionable guidance to strengthen defenses before the next attack.
Cymulate vs Scythe Comparison Chart
Use Case | Capabilities | Scythe |
Defensive Posture Optimization | Security controls integrations | Deep control integrations to validate detection and prevention. | Cannot evaluate and score the effectiveness of an individual control – such as EDR, WAF, email gateway, web gateway, SIEM, cloud workload protection, DLP, etc. Offers integrations with a limited set of EDR and SIEM vendors and requires custom API queries for each scenario and control. | ||
Threat-informed defenses | Automates IoC updates to controls. Custom detection rules for EDR, SIEM and XDR Control tuning guidance. | Provides generic Sigma rules for identified detection gaps. The rules must be manually converted to rules for your specific EDR and SIEM. | |||
Scale Offensive Testing | Attack Scenario creation workbench | Build custom attack chains from a library of >100,000 attack actions. Create custom scenarios/ attack actions. AI attack planner converts threat advisories and plain language prompts into custom attack chains. | Provides a technical tool for red teams and internal open testers to build custom attack chains and create their own executions. | ||
Automation, extensible testing | Out-of-the box templates for threats, controls, cloud, Kubernetes and more. Modify templates and best practices for your specific environment (OS, cloud, databases, SaaS, etc.) | Cannot test cloud security controls, such as cloud workload protection, Kubernetes security and more. | |||
Attack paths | Automated red teaming provides white box and grey box testing to validate attack paths. | Cannot run automated pen testing to identify and map attack paths to critical assets and crown jewels. | |||
Exposure Awareness | Automated & continuous testing | Easy and automated testing for continuous validation of threats, security controls, threats and response capabilities. | Most blue teamers struggle to build campaigns, so Scythe relies on professional services bundled with its tool. Built for one-table top exercises. | ||
Always current attack scenario knowledge | Daily updates of the latest threats and continuously adding new assessments. | Updates its platform monthly with new threats and charges extra for a service that updates IoCs 2-3 days after new threat intel is available. |
Exposure validation that filters out the noise, so you can focus on the exploitable.
Validate Controls
Find and fix your gaps
Validate Threats
Know your risk
Validate Response
Battle test your SOC
Why Companies Choose Cymulate Over Scythe
What our customers say about us
Organizations across all industries choose Cymulate for exposure validation, proactively confirming that defenses are robust and reliable-before an attack occurs.
Upgrading from Scythe
to Cymulate is easy.
We’ve helped clients upgrade from Scythe to Cymulate. We’ll help you build and customize production-safe assessments for all your environments (adding to the ones that Scyther covered), optimize your controls and reduce exposure risk.