Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding Pass-the-Ticket Attacks

What is a Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attack?

A Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attack is a credential theft technique where an attacker steals a valid Kerberos ticket—typically a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT)—and uses it to impersonate a user without needing their password. This allows attackers to bypass normal authentication and gain illicit access to services and data in a Windows Active Directory environment.

How does a Pass-the-Ticket attack work step by step?

First, attackers compromise a domain-connected machine and escalate privileges to extract Kerberos tickets from memory (using tools like Mimikatz). They then inject the stolen ticket into another session or machine, request service tickets from the Key Distribution Center (KDC), and use these tickets to access resources and move laterally across the network.

Why are Pass-the-Ticket attacks considered dangerous?

PtT attacks are dangerous because they use valid Kerberos tickets, making attacker activity appear legitimate. They enable stealthy lateral movement, privilege escalation, and persistence, often bypassing traditional security controls and making detection and remediation difficult.

What is the role of Kerberos in Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Kerberos is the default authentication protocol in modern Windows domains. Attackers exploit Kerberos by stealing Ticket Granting Tickets (TGTs) from memory, which can then be reused to access resources without needing the user's password, enabling lateral movement and privilege escalation.

How do attackers extract Kerberos tickets for a Pass-the-Ticket attack?

Attackers use credential-dumping tools such as Mimikatz or Rubeus to extract Kerberos tickets, including TGTs, from the memory of the LSASS process on compromised machines where users are logged in.

What is lateral movement in the context of Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Lateral movement refers to attackers using stolen Kerberos tickets to move from one compromised system to others within the network, escalating privileges and accessing additional resources without triggering new authentication prompts.

How long are Kerberos tickets valid, and how does this affect attackers?

Kerberos tickets typically have a default lifetime of about 10 hours. Attackers can use stolen tickets within this window to perform reconnaissance, data exfiltration, or escalate privileges. They may also automate ticket extraction or renewal for persistence.

What are the main detection indicators of a Pass-the-Ticket attack?

Indicators include unusual logon patterns (Event ID 4624, type 3), logon events with missing or anomalous fields, Kerberos ticket request anomalies (Event IDs 4768/4769), identical tickets used on multiple systems, and network traffic anomalies detected by NDR tools.

How can organizations detect Pass-the-Ticket attacks using SIEM or UEBA?

Organizations should configure SIEM systems to flag anomalous logins, such as unexpected Kerberos logons or identical Ticket IDs across hosts. User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) can help detect unusual login times or abnormal user activities indicative of ticket misuse.

What are the best practices for preventing Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Best practices include enabling Microsoft Credential Guard, reducing Kerberos ticket lifetimes, applying least privilege and account tiering, hardening and monitoring privileged sessions, frequent credential rotation, using MFA, system hardening, and continuous monitoring and testing.

How does Credential Guard help prevent Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Credential Guard protects sensitive credentials like Kerberos TGTs by storing them in a virtualization-based container, making it much harder for attackers to extract tickets from memory—even with tools like Mimikatz.

What is the difference between Pass-the-Ticket and Pass-the-Hash attacks?

Pass-the-Ticket attacks target Kerberos authentication by reusing stolen tickets, while Pass-the-Hash attacks target NTLM authentication by reusing password hashes. Both allow attackers to impersonate users, but they exploit different authentication mechanisms.

What are Golden Ticket and Silver Ticket attacks, and how do they relate to Pass-the-Ticket?

Golden Ticket attacks involve forging Kerberos TGTs after stealing the KRBTGT account hash, granting domain-wide access. Silver Ticket attacks involve forging service tickets for specific services. Both are related to Pass-the-Ticket as they exploit Kerberos tickets for unauthorized access.

How does Kerberoasting differ from Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Kerberoasting involves requesting service tickets for user-operated service accounts and cracking them offline to obtain plaintext passwords. While not directly a ticket-reuse attack, Kerberoasting often precedes PtT, Silver, or Golden Ticket attacks by providing credentials for further exploitation.

Why is it difficult to remediate Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Remediation is challenging because Kerberos tickets remain valid even if a user's password is changed or the account is disabled. There is no immediate way to invalidate active tickets, giving attackers time to maintain access or establish persistence.

How can network segmentation help defend against Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Network segmentation limits the ability of attackers to move laterally by restricting access between different network segments. This containment strategy reduces the impact of a compromised ticket and helps prevent escalation to critical systems.

What tools are commonly used by attackers in Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Attackers often use tools like Mimikatz and Rubeus to extract and inject Kerberos tickets from system memory, enabling them to impersonate users and move laterally within the network.

How does Cymulate help organizations defend against Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Cymulate's Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and Continuous Automated Red Teaming (CART) modules allow organizations to safely simulate Pass-the-Ticket and other lateral movement attacks. This helps assess detection and response capabilities, validate SIEM rules, and identify visibility gaps before attackers can exploit them. Learn more

Can Cymulate validate the effectiveness of my SIEM and EDR against Pass-the-Ticket attacks?

Yes, Cymulate's platform includes modules to validate SIEM correlation rules and EDR effectiveness by simulating real-world attacks, including Pass-the-Ticket scenarios. This ensures your detection and response mechanisms are working as intended.

How does continuous validation with Cymulate improve defenses against lateral movement?

Continuous validation with Cymulate allows organizations to regularly test and improve their defenses by simulating attacks, verifying the effectiveness of mitigations, and ensuring SOC readiness. This proactive approach helps identify and close security gaps before attackers can exploit them.

Features & Capabilities

What are the key capabilities of Cymulate's platform for defending against credential-based attacks?

Cymulate offers continuous threat validation, unified Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS), Continuous Automated Red Teaming (CART), exposure analytics, attack path discovery, automated mitigation, AI-powered optimization, and an extensive threat library with over 100,000 attack actions updated daily. Learn more

Does Cymulate integrate with other security tools for enhanced detection?

Yes, Cymulate integrates with a wide range of security technologies, including Akamai Guardicore, AWS GuardDuty, BlackBerry Cylance OPTICS, Carbon Black EDR, Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon, Wiz, SentinelOne, and more. See the full list

How easy is it to implement Cymulate for testing lateral movement defenses?

Cymulate is designed for quick and easy implementation, operating in agentless mode without the need for additional hardware or complex configurations. Customers can start running simulations almost immediately after deployment. Comprehensive support and educational resources are available. Schedule a demo

What feedback have customers given about Cymulate's ease of use?

Customers consistently praise Cymulate for its intuitive interface and ease of use. For example, Raphael Ferreira, Cybersecurity Manager, said, "Cymulate is easy to implement and use—all you need to do is click a few buttons, and you receive a lot of practical insights into how you can improve your security posture." Read more testimonials

What security and compliance certifications does Cymulate hold?

Cymulate holds several key certifications, including SOC2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, and CSA STAR Level 1. These certifications demonstrate Cymulate's commitment to robust security and compliance standards. Learn more

How does Cymulate ensure data security and privacy?

Cymulate ensures data security through encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+) and at rest (AES-256), secure AWS-hosted data centers, a tested disaster recovery plan, and compliance with GDPR. The platform also features mandatory 2FA, RBAC, IP restrictions, and a dedicated privacy and security team.

Use Cases & Benefits

Who can benefit from using Cymulate for lateral movement defense?

Cymulate is designed for CISOs, security leaders, SecOps teams, red teams, and vulnerability management teams in organizations of all sizes and industries, including finance, healthcare, retail, and more. Learn more

What business impact can organizations expect from using Cymulate?

Organizations using Cymulate have reported up to a 52% reduction in critical exposures, a 60% increase in team efficiency, and an 81% reduction in cyber risk within four months. These outcomes are supported by customer case studies. See the Hertz Israel case study

Are there case studies showing Cymulate's effectiveness against lateral movement attacks?

Yes, for example, Hertz Israel reduced cyber risk by 81% in four months by addressing gaps in visibility and control with Cymulate. Other case studies highlight improved detection, compliance, and operational efficiency. Explore case studies

How does Cymulate address the pain points of fragmented security tools and unclear risk prioritization?

Cymulate integrates exposure data and automates validation to provide a unified view of security posture. It prioritizes exposures by validating exploitability and providing actionable insights, helping teams focus on the most critical vulnerabilities.

What are the main pain points Cymulate solves for security teams?

Cymulate addresses fragmented security tools, resource constraints, unclear risk prioritization, cloud complexity, communication barriers, inadequate threat simulation, operational inefficiencies in vulnerability management, and post-breach recovery challenges.

How does Cymulate tailor its solutions for different security roles?

Cymulate provides quantifiable metrics for CISOs, automates processes for SecOps teams, offers advanced offensive testing for red teams, and enables efficient vulnerability prioritization for vulnerability management teams. Learn more

Pricing & Plans

What is Cymulate's pricing model?

Cymulate operates on a subscription-based pricing model tailored to each organization's requirements. Pricing depends on the chosen package, number of assets, and scenarios selected. For a detailed quote, schedule a demo.

Educational Resources & Support

Does Cymulate provide a glossary of cybersecurity terms?

Yes, Cymulate offers a comprehensive glossary explaining cybersecurity terms, acronyms, and jargon. View the glossary

Where can I find additional resources like reports, blog posts, and case studies?

Cymulate provides a Resource Hub, blog, case studies, and industry reports such as the Threat Exposure Validation Impact Report 2025. Explore resources

What support options are available for Cymulate customers?

Cymulate offers email support, real-time chat support, a knowledge base with technical articles and videos, webinars, e-books, and an AI chatbot for quick answers and guidance. Contact support

Company & Vision

What is Cymulate's mission and vision?

Cymulate's mission is to transform cybersecurity practices by enabling organizations to proactively validate defenses, identify vulnerabilities, and optimize their security posture. The vision is to create a collaborative environment for lasting improvements in cybersecurity strategies. Learn more

What makes Cymulate different from other security validation platforms?

Cymulate stands out with its unified platform combining BAS, CART, and exposure analytics, continuous threat validation, AI-powered optimization, ease of use, and measurable outcomes such as a 52% reduction in critical exposures and 81% reduction in cyber risk. See comparisons

Cymulate named a Customers' Choice in 2025 Gartner® Peer Insights™
Learn More
New Case Study: Credit Union Boosts Threat Prevention & Detection with Cymulate
Learn More
New Research: Cymulate Research Labs Discovers Token Validation Flaw
Learn More
An Inside Look at the Technology Behind Cymulate
Learn More

Pass-the-Ticket Attack

What is a Pass-the-Ticket Attack? How to Detect, Prevent and Stop Lateral Movement 

A Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attack is a credential theft technique where an attacker steals a valid Kerberos ticket – typically a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) – and uses it to impersonate a user without needing their password.  

In a Windows Active Directory environment (which relies on Kerberos for authentication), this means the attacker can bypass normal authentication and gain illicit access to services and data using the stolen ticket.  

Essentially, the attacker “passes” the stolen ticket to trick other systems into believing they are an authenticated user. This method is akin to the more widely known Pass-the-Hash attack (which abuses password hashes), but Pass-the-Ticket targets Kerberos – the default authentication protocol in modern Windows domains. 

Kerberos Context 

Kerberos uses tickets to authenticate users transparently after they log in. When a user enters credentials, the Key Distribution Center (KDC) on a domain controller issues a TGT (Ticket-Granting Ticket), which the user’s system then uses to request service tickets for specific resources. The TGT is like a master key that proves your identity to the KDC; with it, you can get access to other network services without re-entering your password.  

In a Pass-the-Ticket attack, this trusted mechanism is abused – an attacker with a stolen TGT can obtain service tickets or directly access services as that user.  

Because the ticket is a cryptographic token vouching for the user’s identity, any service that accepts Kerberos tickets will accept the attacker as the legitimate user if the ticket is valid. 

In other words, once attackers have a foothold on one system, Pass-the-Ticket lets them pivot to other systems by reusing the stolen Kerberos tickets, all without triggering additional logon prompts or needing to crack passwords. This makes PtT a favored technique in many advanced intrusions, allowing attackers to escalate their access and roam the network as an authorized user – a nightmare scenario for defenders. 

How a Pass-the-Ticket Attack Works  

To understand how a Pass-the-Ticket attack unfolds, it’s important to grasp how Kerberos authentication works. Here is a step-by-step breakdown of a typical PtT attack, including the role of the TGT: 

1. Initial compromise and ticket extraction 

Attackers first gain access to a domain-connected machine, usually via phishing, malware, or exploiting vulnerabilities. After securing access, they escalate privileges—typically gaining local administrator rights—to read sensitive information stored in system memory. Active Kerberos tickets, including Ticket-Granting Tickets (TGTs), reside within the memory of the LSASS process when users are logged in.  

Attackers use credential-dumping tools such as Mimikatz or Rubeus to extract these tickets directly from memory. The TGT is particularly valuable, as it can authenticate to any resource within the domain to which the user has access rights. 

2. Ticket import/injection 

After extracting the TGT from memory, attackers inject or import this ticket into another logon session or onto another machine they control.  

Mimikatz offers specific functionality to inject the stolen Kerberos ticket into an attacker’s current session, effectively allowing the attacker to assume the identity of the victim user without ever needing the user’s password. 

3. Requesting service tickets or accessing services 

 With the valid, stolen TGT now active in the attacker’s Kerberos cache, the attacker can request Ticket-Granting Service (TGS) tickets from the domain’s Key Distribution Center (KDC)

Because the TGT is legitimate, the KDC treats these requests as valid and issues service tickets accordingly.  

The attacker uses these service tickets to access domain resources, such as file shares, databases, or even additional servers. Sometimes attackers directly reuse stolen service tickets without needing to interact further with the KDC. The receiving services see these tickets as legitimate since they are genuinely signed by the KDC. 

4. Lateral movement and privilege abuse 

Attackers exploit these valid Kerberos tickets to move laterally across the network, hopping from machine to machine. After gaining initial access to one server using stolen tickets, they often extract more tickets stored on that server—potentially tickets from accounts with elevated privileges, such as a domain administrator.  

lateral movement

This allows attackers to escalate privileges rapidly and quietly across systems, progressively accessing more sensitive network resources. Because Pass-the-Ticket attacks reuse legitimate tickets, attackers can continuously bypass authentication mechanisms without triggering password-related alarms or account lockouts. 

5. Maintaining access and persistence 

Kerberos tickets have a default limited lifetime (typically about 10 hours). Within this timeframe, attackers can perform extensive reconnaissance or data exfiltration. To maintain long-term persistence, attackers may automate periodic ticket extraction or ticket renewal processes, ensuring continuous access.  

In advanced scenarios, attackers may aim to compromise the Kerberos KDC itself by obtaining the KRBTGT account hash, enabling them to forge entirely new tickets—a more severe compromise known as a Golden Ticket attack. Even without forging new tickets, attackers might set backdoors or create new accounts to ensure continuous presence within the compromised environment. 

The Critical Risks of Pass-the-Ticket Attacks 

Pass-the-Ticket attacks are a serious threat to organizations because they combine stealth, persistence, and lateral movement in one technique. Here are the key reasons these attacks are particularly dangerous: 

Stealthy and legitimate-looking access 

Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attacks exploit valid Kerberos tickets, making the attacker’s activities look like normal user behavior. Because these tickets are genuinely issued by the domain’s Key Distribution Center (KDC), attackers avoid typical detection methods that rely on spotting brute-force attempts, failed logins, or malware signatures.  

Standard defenses like strong passwords and even multi-factor authentication (MFA) are ineffective once a ticket is stolen, as attackers reuse existing authenticated tokens without needing to trigger another login challenge. 

Enables broad lateral movement 

Once attackers have stolen a valid Kerberos ticket, they can move freely across the network—limited only by the permissions of the stolen ticket’s original user. Often, an attacker starts by compromising a regular user’s account, using that access to move deeper into the network by impersonating higher-privilege users.  

This process enables attackers to escalate privileges, potentially reaching domain controllers or other sensitive systems, without exploiting additional vulnerabilities or cracking passwords. Essentially, PtT allows attackers to impersonate authorized users and quietly move throughout the network undetected. 

Persistence and difficult remediation 

Kerberos tickets typically remain valid even if a user’s password is changed or an account is disabled. Attackers leverage this by rapidly using stolen tickets and sometimes renewing them, ensuring continued access until the tickets naturally expire. 

Incident response is challenging because there's no straightforward method to immediately invalidate active Kerberos tickets; even password resets or account disabling don't instantly terminate a ticket’s validity. The delay in revocation gives attackers ample time to maintain a foothold, carry out espionage, or establish persistent backdoors. 

Credential reuse sidesteps many security controls 

PtT represents a type of credential compromise that evades multiple layers of security. Password strength, lockout policies, or traditional intrusion detection methods become irrelevant because the attacker isn't performing actions that typically raise alerts.  

Attackers favor this technique because it allows them to extend an initial breach into a complete compromise of the network without noisy activity. Combining PtT with tools like Mimikatz Kerberos modules can even automate the attack, making it more effective and harder to detect. 

Detection Indicators of Pass-the-Ticket Activity 

Detecting Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attacks requires close monitoring of authentication logs for subtle anomalies. Key indicators include: 

Unusual logon patterns (Event ID 4624, type 3) 

A Pass-the-Ticket attack often creates unexpected network logons (Event ID 4624, Type 3) from machines that a user wouldn't typically access.  

For instance, a sudden Kerberos network logon by a regular user on a critical server (rather than their usual workstation) could signal ticket reuse. Security teams should configure their SIEM systems to highlight logins that deviate from normal user behavior. 

Logon events with missing or anomalous fields 

Attackers using stolen or forged Kerberos tickets might generate Windows Event logs (4624 or 4672) containing irregularities, such as blank "account domain" or "Logon GUID" fields.  

While normal logons populate these fields, attackers' activities—particularly with Golden Tickets—can leave these suspiciously empty, indicating ticket forgery or reuse. 

Kerberos ticket request anomalies (Event IDs 4768/4769) 

Under normal circumstances, obtaining a service ticket (Event ID 4769) follows shortly after a Ticket-Granting Ticket (TGT) request (Event ID 4768). 

In Pass-the-Ticket attacks, however, service tickets may be requested without corresponding recent TGT requests from the same system or user, indicating ticket reuse or forgery. Additionally, tickets with unusually long or future expiration dates strongly suggest malicious activity. 

Multiple systems using identical tickets or unexpected ticket use 

Monitoring for identical Ticket IDs appearing across multiple hosts is another strong indicator, as a single TGT should only be used by the original requesting system. Furthermore, if regular users suddenly access sensitive resources like Active Directory or executive file shares using Kerberos tickets, it can indicate stolen tickets being leveraged for unauthorized access. 

Monitoring tools and anomalous behavior analytics (Ueba) 

Organizations should enable comprehensive Kerberos audit logging across domain controllers and critical servers.  

Behavioral analytics tools (UEBA) help detect anomalies like unusual login times or abnormal user activities. Additionally, security solutions may flag indirect indicators, such as Mimikatz triggering security alerts or antivirus detections when injecting tickets into memory. 

Network traffic anomalies 

Network Detection and Response (NDR) tools can detect irregular Kerberos traffic patterns (e.g., unexpected KRB_TGS_REQ/KRB_AS_REQ messages or tickets with abnormal timestamps or ciphers). Combining network-level monitoring with host-based logs significantly improves the chances of detecting stealthy Pass-the-Ticket activity. 

Prevention and Mitigation Strategies 

Preventing Pass-the-Ticket attacks involves securing systems to limit ticket theft opportunities and restricting attackers' capabilities if tickets are compromised. Key strategies include: 

  1. Enable credential guard: Microsoft’s Credential Guard protects sensitive credentials (like Kerberos TGTs and NTLM hashes) by storing them securely in a virtualization-based container, preventing attackers from extracting them—even with tools like Mimikatz. Deploy Credential Guard on all supported Windows endpoints and servers, particularly privileged systems. 
  2. Limit kerberos ticket lifetimes: Reduce the default Kerberos Ticket-Granting Ticket (TGT) lifetime (usually 10 hours) to shorter intervals (e.g., 4-6 hours). Shorter lifetimes shrink the window attackers have to misuse stolen tickets. Monitor for unusually aged tickets, as they often indicate malicious activity. 
  3. Apply least privilege and account tiering: Restrict user privileges to minimize damage if credentials are stolen. Limit the use of administrative accounts, avoid shared local admin credentials, and enforce privileged account tiering. Tools like LAPS (Local Administrator Password Solution) help randomize local admin passwords, further hindering lateral movement. 
  4. Harden and monitor privileged sessions: Leverage security features like Restricted Admin Mode for RDP to avoid credential exposure. Regularly purge idle Kerberos tickets (using commands like klist purge) to prevent lingering credentials. Segment your network to block lateral movements from compromised machines. 
  5. Frequent credential rotation & rapid response: Regularly rotate privileged account passwords, including the critical KRBTGT account, to minimize attackers’ persistence opportunities. Implement rapid response protocols (such as "Credential DoubleTap")—quickly resetting compromised passwords twice to invalidate stolen tickets and clearing cached credentials from memory. 
  6. Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) wisely: While MFA doesn't stop an attacker reusing stolen tickets, it significantly raises the bar for the initial compromise. Enforce MFA for remote and privileged logins, and consider smartcards or certificate-based Kerberos authentication (PKINIT) to prevent easy ticket theft. 
  7. System hardening and regular updates: Keep systems, especially domain controllers, fully patched to benefit from Kerberos-related security improvements. Disable legacy protocols like NTLM where possible, and adhere to recommended Microsoft Active Directory security baselines. 
  8. Continuous monitoring and testing: Consistently monitor Active Directory and Kerberos activity for anomalies and regularly train security analysts on attack patterns. Use specialized tools to detect unusual AD changes and perform ongoing testing of defenses to promptly detect and respond to incidents. 

Implementing these layered security practices significantly reduces the likelihood and impact of Pass-the-Ticket attacks, ensuring attackers must resort to riskier or noisier techniques, thus enhancing your ability to detect and neutralize threats quickly. 

Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) is related to several credential theft techniques: 

  • Pass-the-Hash (PtH): Targets NTLM authentication. Attackers steal and reuse password hashes (without cracking passwords) to access resources. It's similar to PtT but involves NTLM hashes instead of Kerberos tickets. 
  • Golden Ticket: Attackers steal the KRBTGT account hash from the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC), enabling them to forge powerful, unrestricted TGTs with custom privileges and long lifetimes. Golden Tickets grant persistent domain-wide access, making them extremely dangerous and difficult to detect without careful monitoring. 
  • Silver Ticket: Attackers forge Kerberos service tickets (TGS) for individual services after compromising a service account’s password hash. Unlike Golden Tickets, Silver Tickets don't involve the KDC directly at authentication time, making detection more challenging. Protecting service accounts with strong, rotated passwords and enabling PAC signature validation helps prevent this attack. 
  • Kerberoasting: Attackers request service tickets for user-operated service accounts, then crack these tickets offline to obtain plaintext passwords. While not directly a ticket-reuse attack, Kerberoasting often precedes PtT, Silver, or Golden Ticket attacks by giving attackers credentials needed for these techniques. Defenses include using strong passwords and managed service accounts. 

Defenders should be aware of all these, as attackers might chain techniques together. For instance, a common attack path in a network is: phishing -> dump hashes -> PtH to move laterally -> find service account -> Kerberoast -> crack password -> Silver Ticket or PtT -> get domain admin -> Golden Ticket for persistence. Understanding the differences helps in deploying the right mitigations and detections at each stage. 

Simulating and Preventing Lateral Movement with Cymulate 

The Cymulate Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and security posture management platform helps organizations proactively test and strengthen defenses against lateral movement attacks like Pass-the-Ticket.  

By safely simulating real-world attack scenarios—including credential compromise (using tools like Mimikatz), Pass-the-Ticket, and other lateral movement techniques—Cymulate assesses your detection and response capabilities in a controlled environment. 

The platform includes modules such as Continuous Automated Red Teaming (CART) to perform realistic, multi-stage attack simulations. These simulations validate your SIEM correlation rules, EDR effectiveness, and overall security configuration, identifying visibility gaps before attackers exploit them. 

Cymulate enables continuous validation, verifying defensive improvements after implementing mitigations like Credential Guard, Kerberos hardening, or MFA. Regular simulations serve as security "fire-drills," ensuring SOC readiness and enhancing compliance reporting. 

Ultimately, Cymulate ensures your organization stays ahead by converting theoretical security measures into tested, practical defenses against sophisticated lateral movement threats like Pass-the-Ticket. 

Key Takeaways 

  • Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attacks leverage stolen Kerberos tickets to bypass normal authentication, allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate users without passwords. Protecting credentials stored in memory (such as TGTs) is essential. 
  • PtT attacks enable stealthy lateral movement and privilege escalation, helping attackers deepen their foothold in networks. Defenses such as network segmentation and user behavior monitoring are crucial. 
  • Effective detection involves monitoring for anomalies in authentication logs (e.g., event IDs 4624, 4768, 4769). No single indicator is definitive, but correlation and behavioral analytics are key. 
  • Prevention focuses on credential hardening (e.g., using Credential Guard), account hygiene, and layered defenses. Assume attackers will bypass individual measures; implement multiple overlapping controls. 
  • Understanding related attacks (Pass-the-Hash, Golden Ticket, Silver Ticket, Kerberoasting) is vital for creating holistic defenses, ensuring no gaps remain for attackers to exploit. 
Book a Demo