With the accelerating evolution of the threat landscape, the emergence of new ransomware strains, threatening crypters, evasive Remote Access Trojan (RAT) loaders, and more, the efficiency of periodic manual pen tests is shrinking at a worrying speed.
What is Automated Pen Testing, and How Does it Work?
Pen testing is a crucial process that involves ethical hackers, also known as pen testers, attempting to breach a company’s security infrastructure to find vulnerabilities that need to be addressed. This testing helps to ensure the overall web application security of an organization. Pen testing can involve accessing various application systems such as APIs, frontend/backend servers, and more to uncover vulnerabilities like code injection attacks. It is essential for companies to conduct pen testing regularly as part of a holistic strategy, using automated pen testing tools such as vulnerability scans to continuously validate and improve their security systems and protect themselves from potential cyber threats from a testing team.
Automated pen testing, also known as ethical hacking, involves using automated tools to test a computer system, network, or web application to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers. One of the techniques used in automated pen testing is black box testing, where testers are not given any prior knowledge of the system. This allows for a real-world attack to be simulated, giving organizations a better understanding of their system’s vulnerabilities. Personnel pen testing specifically targets employees’ cybersecurity hygiene and assesses how vulnerable a company is to social engineering attacks and physical security risks. It is important for ethical hackers to use social engineering techniques, as well as physical pen testing, in order to find vulnerabilities and improve the overall security of a system through best practices.
As its name indicates, automated pen testing is the automated version of manual pen testing. The necessity for automation arose when classic pen testing could no longer identify the majority of gaps exploitable by cyber-attackers because of:
- The massive adoption of agile development across all industry sectors: From a cybersecurity perspective, the consequence of frequent deployments that are the hallmark of agile development means that environments are constantly evolving, nullifying the result of pen tests performed on pre-new deployments’ configuration.
- The automation of cyber-criminal tools: Tools and off-the-shelf digital services such as RaaS (Ransomware as a Service) or MaaS (Malware as a Service) that use AI/ML capabilities to enhance the efficiency of attacks translate into an accrued complexity and variety of cyber-attacks combined with a reduced reliance on advanced coding skills to launch attacks. Reliance on manual pen testing skills to emulate the ability of attackers equipped with automated tools is illusory.
- The ever-growing tide of high-risk vulnerabilities: A number of factors, including the need for speed in agile development and the resulting reliance on open-source and other ready-made pieces of code, led to an ever-growing number of high-risk vulnerabilities. In this context, validating an infrastructure resilience requires validating that security controls configuration is optimized, not only that it is resilient to the current list of vulnerabilities.
The logical response when the function filled by a manual process is becoming too labor-intensive to be practically met is to automate as much of the process as possible. Thus, was born the concept of Automated Pen Testing.
What is Automated Pen Testing?
Originally, automating pen testing entailed replacing most of the repetitive tasks performed by a human pen tester with automation. Yet, as complexity grew beyond the ability of any human to keep an overarching view of the entire cyber-criminal capabilities, the generic field of automated pen testing had to evolve and become what is now known as Continuous Security Validation.
How Does Automated Pen Testing Work?
At its core, automated pen testing capitalizes on AI capabilities to imitate the techniques used by cyber-attackers. The two main sides to automated pen tests are external and internal.
What are External Automated Pen Tests?
External pen tests consist of emulating attackers’ thinking processes and techniques used to find a weakness in the attack surface, gain an initial foothold, and progress laterally and vertically within the targeted environment. External automated pen testing focuses on simulating attacks from the outside, mimicking the actions of hackers attempting to breach your organization’s perimeter defenses. It involves scanning for vulnerabilities, including exploitable vulnerabilities, identifying potential entry points, and attempting to exploit them. By emulating real-world attack scenarios, it helps identify weaknesses in your external-facing systems and provides insights on how to strengthen your defenses.
Why are Automated Pen Tests Important?
On the other hand, internal automated pen testing concentrates on assessing the security of your internal network and systems. It aims to replicate the actions of an insider threat or a compromised user within your organization.
Automating these external pen tests is broken down into a series of continuous security validation tools covering an attack’s various steps:
- Attack Surface Management: This mimics an attacker’s recon phase, where the attacker looks for unmonitored, unsecured, digitally accessible assets that they could potentially leverage to gain an initial foothold in the targeted environment.
- Phishing Awareness: This automates the bulk of creating, sending, and monitoring the response to a series of emails containing enticement to click on an infected link or download a compromised attachment.
- Automated Red Team Campaigns: This mimics the way an attacker would progress within the targeted environment after successfully breaching its attack surface to gain control over as many resources as possible.
What are Internal Automated Pen Tests?
Internal automated pen tests, also known as breach and attack simulations (BAS), consist of running a comprehensive set of attack scenarios, such as those listed on MITRE ATT&CK, to test the resilience of a business’s network infrastructure. These simulations utilize the tactics, techniques, and processes (TTPs) used by cyber-attackers to assess the environment’s ability to detect, preempt, or respond to these simulated attacks. BAS is a valuable tool for automating and streamlining internal pen tests.
Internal automated pen tests, also known as internal red teaming, are an essential part of a comprehensive strategy. These tests, also referred to as internal tests, go beyond the typical external pen tests and aim to replicate the actions of an insider threat or a compromised user within your organization. By automating these tests, you can ensure a continuous validation of your security controls and detect any potential unauthorized access attempts.
One key aspect of internal automated pen tests is Attack Surface Management. This phase mimics an attacker’s reconnaissance phase, where they search for unmonitored and unsecured assets that could serve as entry points into your environment.
The results of these simulated internal and external attacks are then compared to the performance of detection and response tools to evaluate their efficacy.
Key Benefits of Mature Automated Pen Testing
Mature automated pen testing, better known today as continuous security validation, yields benefit on multiple levels:
Security Benefits of Automated Pen Testing
- Full visibility of security posture: The discrepancy between the simulated attacks launched and those detected, prevented, or mitigated provides a bird’s eye view of where gaps are.
- Security drift monitoring: The availability of exact risk level measurements allows easy monitoring of potential deterioration in real-time, enabling taking corrective measures as soon as any variance from accepted baselines is detected.
- Resilience against emerging threats: When available in the automated pen testing service basket, immediate threat intelligence enables instantaneously testing the infrastructure’s resilience to emerging threats.
- Eliminating repetitive manual tasks: Automating repetitive and predictable tasks frees the security team’s time for higher-level tasks requiring creativity.
- Rationalization and optimization of existing security tools: The precise identification of which tool is detecting, preventing, or mitigating which simulated attacks enables the security to:
- • Identify capability overlap between tools
- • Reconfigure detection tools to optimize detection, prevention, and mitigation
- • Detect missing capabilities
- Reduction of false-positive alerts: Informed rationalization and optimization of the defensive tool stack eliminate a large percentage of false-positive alerts, reducing wasted time and preventing alert fatigue.
Business Benefits of Automated Pen Testing
- Availability of exact metrics: Automated pen testing measures exactly the ratio of attacks stopped by the existing defensive controls compared to the number of attacks launched. When adjusted to take into account other factors such as CVSS score and DREAD type risk assessment models, the risk level can be precisely quantified.
- Optimized patching schedule: The ability to evaluate how security controls compensate for the gaps stemming from vulnerabilities with Attack Based Vulnerability Management (ABVM) can reduce IT patching workload by up to 50% while hardening the overall security posture.
- Increased defensive tool stack ROI: Rationalize and optimize the defensive tools stack with quantified metrics and detailed information to:
- • Prevent unnecessary solution purchases leading to tool sprawl
- • Avoid unnecessary complexity eating up analysts’ time
- • Provide metrics enabling the exact evaluation of the defensive array ROI
- Facilitated compliance: especially at a time when regulators increase demand for security validation, automated pen testing combined with automated report generation enables documenting security validation processes.
- Better cyber-insurance rates: The documented and quantified security posture risk level facilitates negotiating with cyber-insurance underwriters and lowering the primes.
Pen testing is an important part of data security, especially for companies that need to comply with regulations like HIPAA and GDPR. These tests can help ensure that security controls are working as intended and can support risk assessments as outlined in security standards like NIST SP 800-53. Businesses are advised to carry out regular pen tests to stay on top of security upgrades and patches and maintain compliance with data security standards like PCI DSS. By performing these tests, companies can better protect their sensitive data from potential threats such as data breaches and identify any security issues that may arise.
As an added bonus, the availability of exact metrics enables the cybersecurity team to quantify risk and define KPIs instead of baselines established with guestimates, facilitating communication with the board.
The BAS Revolution and the Future of Automated Pen Testing
With a clearer idea of the numerous benefits of automated pen testing, let’s have a closer look at what is the best-known continuous security validation tool today, Breach and Attack Simulation Attack (BAS).
One of the key ingredients necessary to yield the full benefits of automated pen testing is the ability to run tests continuously. BAS is historically the first continuous security validation tool to make it to Gartner’s Hype Cycle for Threat Facing Technologies, where it was listed as an innovation trigger in 2017. As such, it was the first continuous security validation tool to be available with more than one vendor, albeit with far fewer capabilities than today.
Since its inception, automated pen testing has become an essential practice for businesses aiming to safeguard their data and comply with standards. With the rise of regulations like HIPAA and GDPR, organizations need to ensure that their security controls are working effectively. Regular pen tests, including those conducted using open source frameworks and methodologies such as the OSSTMM and PTES, not only help identify potential vulnerabilities but also support risk assessments as outlined in NIST SP 800-53. These tests also play a crucial role in assessing the effectiveness of an organization’s security measures, making them a vital part of the BAS revolution and the future of security validation.
Maintaining compliance with data security standards such as PCI DSS is crucial for businesses looking to protect sensitive information. By performing thorough pen tests, companies can stay ahead of security upgrades and patches, ultimately safeguarding their data from potential threats like cyberattacks and data breaches. Automated pen testing with tools like BAS offers a more efficient and accurate way to identify vulnerabilities compared to manual testing.
The evolution of BAS has been remarkable, with continuous advancements in its capabilities over the years. What started as a basic tool has now transformed into a comprehensive solution that covers a wide range of aspects. From simulating sophisticated attacks to assessing the effectiveness of security controls, BAS revolutionizes the way organizations approach pen testing.
What is pen testing and why is it important?
Pen testing, commonly known as pen test, is a simulated cyber attack designed to test the security of a computer system. It is carried out by authorized professionals who use the same tools and techniques as attackers to identify vulnerabilities in the system. The pen test process includes identifying weak points, exploiting them, and providing recommendations on how to improve. Pen test is often used in web application security as it can help identify weaknesses that can be addressed with web application firewalls (WAFs). With the increasing risk of cyber-attacks, pen testing has become an essential practice for organizations to protect their systems from potential threats. However, it is important to note that pen testing is not the same as a vulnerability assessment, which primarily focuses on scanning and evaluating security rather than simulating an attack. Both practices are important for maintaining continuous security validation.
Today, BAS tools validate the efficacy of endpoint security, email gateways, web gateways, Web Application Firewalls (WAFs), and data exfiltration, and ideally include updated Immediate Threat Intelligence and full kill chain capabilities. BAS solutions require the integration of a lightweight agent to function and provide detailed information about gaps as well as mitigation recommendations that accelerate remediation and harden security posture.
However, as an agent-based solution, BAS fails to cover outside-in attack aspects such as gaining an initial foothold, an essential step in any attack emanating from outside the environment. Advanced pen testing automation platforms include attack surface management (ASM), phishing awareness, lateral movement simulation capabilities, and the latest generation of vulnerability management software, Attack Based Vulnerability Management (ABVM) which uses the data collected during automated pen tests to optimize and reduce the vulnerability patching schedule for professionals.
Leading continuous security validation vendors such as Cymulate integrate BAS in a comprehensive Extended Security Posture Management (XSPM) platform that also facilitates the analyst’s work with customizable dynamic dashboards and accelerates the mitigation process by integrating ticketing systems. In the future, continuous security validation tools will expand their capabilities to extensively cover supply-chain-born risks, OT, IoT, and more domains as digital technology evolves.
Manual vs. Automated Pen Testing – Can it Replace Humans?
Can all this automation ever replace the need for human beings? Not in the foreseeable future.
Though the automation that is the core to continuous security validation can process vast amounts of information, perform endless repetitive tasks without losing focus or getting tired, generate exhaustive reports, and even learn to recognize outlying behaviors, they lack creative thinking abilities and the capacity to infer causal links from a set of data.
Causal inference and creative thinking are still reserved for humans for the foreseeable future, and both are key to effectively analyzing the data produced by automated pen testing techniques. Humans’ role in cybersecurity remains crucial, but continuous security validation solutions are diligent assistants that perform the tedious work and crunch enormous amounts of data to produce digestible and actionable information. Humans can then leverage that information to optimize their decision process.
Conclusion
Despite their relatively recent emergence, automated pen testing tools already have a rich history, starting with custom-made pieces of code produced in-house by cybersecurity staff to full-fledged, multi-layered, continuous security validation solutions with multiple vendors.
The continuous security validation market is vibrant and, as knowledge about its ability to harden organizations’ security posture without requiring considerable additional resources spreads, its gradual adoption by the wider public might translate into a turning of the tide in the war against cybercriminals.
